On 6/5/13, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > On 6/5/13 4:44 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote: >> The needs based policies will need to be constantly tightened "to keep >> from running out". > Exactly why do you advocate that?
I think the implementation of policy shifts to stricter and stricter review and requirements, is already an established fact, not a proposal? Something that happens anyways, but still doesn't stop exhaustion; just a small delay. Isn't continuously "tightening the needs based policies" what the "IPV4 Countdown plan" is all about? "PHASE FOUR (ONE /8 EQUIVALENT REMAINING)" "All requests of any size will be subject to team review." "The hold period for returned, reclaimed, and revoked blocks will be reduced to one month." I read this as "a higher standard of need" and "higher standard of proof" will be required, as the pool shrinks; divided into 4 phases. > ~Seth -- -J _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
