Bill suggested a waiting period with a between allocations and I suggested it be 6 months with a hardship option. See post from earlier this morning.
-----Original Message----- From: Brandon Ross [mailto:br...@pobox.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:34 PM To: Steven Ryerse Cc: Mike Burns; Mike Burns; ARIN PPML Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] A Redefinition of IPv4 Need post ARINrun-out(was:Re:Against 2013-4) On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Steven Ryerse wrote: > Certainly the big guys can take care of themselves but they shouldn't > be arbitrarily excluded. Huh? How are they excluded? > I think this change should apply to the free pool as well. Obviously > hoarding isn't good but there is only so much that can be done to > prevent it. If some extra allocations happen then that means we are > just closer to IPv6 and whatever IPv4 market happens with legacy > blocks that become available one way or another after ARINs free pool > exhaustion. I strongly disagree this should apply to the free pool. If it were, there would be nothing stopping me from getting IPv4 space, selling it on the transfer market, then coming back for more, time and time again, until the free pool is exhausted. -- Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442 Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
