Kevin, On Sep 13, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kargel <kkar...@polartel.com> wrote: > A traceroute would only satisfy an initial test. Trivially easy to set one > up, get your allocation, and then move the network to where you really wanted > it.
Yes. However, if this subterfuge was noticed, the policy would give ARIN the capability to do something about it (if necessary), just like other ARIN policies. > Just like ARIN follows up on the utilization requirement? I've been told ARIN has revoked address space for violation of policy. > Anti-grandfather means that the restrictions should equally apply to existing > allocations, and current allocations that are operating outside of the ARIN > region should be required to obtain allocations from their region and return > the ARIN allocation. My understanding of the policy proposal was that it was to apply to future allocations because the out-of-region requests appear to be increasing with the exhaustion of various RIR free pools. Historically, it has been ... challenging to retroactively apply policy to pre-existing allocations. If such retroactive application were desired (not going to comment one way or another on that aspect), I'd suggest it should be a different policy proposal. Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
