I do not support the change from 2 to 3 for end user ixp s. See my earlier remarks. Does ARIN have good evidence of abuse of the current situation?
Rudi Daniel (information technologist) 784 430 9235 On Feb 6, 2014 1:07 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok.William...thanks for that...was not too sure. > > RD > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:34 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Rudolph Daniel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > In the small Caribbean states, although there seems to be >> > policy to implement IXP s, many are still not getting the buy >> > in from existing ISP s ...so it is possible that an IXP could >> > get off the ground with 2 and once up and running, others >> > will join in. >> >> Hi Rudi, >> >> There aren't many use cases in which renumbering is genuinely trivial. >> Three nodes in a BGP exchange is one of them. >> >> Regards, >> Bill Herrin >> >> >> >> -- >> William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] >> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> >> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 >> > > > > -- > > Rudi Daniel > > *danielcharles consulting > <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>* > > >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
