Opposed as written.
Agree with the following reasoning. I am OK with the 2 -> 3 change.
John Springer
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Heather Schiller wrote:
I oppose the policy as written.
I don't have an opinion on the 2 vs 3, though I see it as such a small change
and given the total number of CI IX assignments (66 over
how many years?) it won't significantly change anything.
I am opposed to the policy because of this line " IXP's formed as non profits
will be considered end user organizations. All others will
be considered ISPs."
This statement will impact the overwhelming majority of Critical
Infrastructure assignment holders, the majority of which are not IX's.
The goal of attempting preservation should be done by how the allocation is
justified, not how much the entity is billed. 111 of the
CI allocations are not to IX's. Of the 66 IX allocations it is nearly split
between end users and ISP's.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Brandon Ross <br...@pobox.com> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Owen DeLong wrote:
I oppose the change. Anyone inclined to abuse a two participant
standard can easily create or obtain a 3rd
participant for said purpose. This is literally a case of change
for the sake of change. No, a 3 participant
minimum is not an unreasonable standard. However, since it does
have some negative impact and is utterly
unlikely to be at all effective in deterring abuse, I see no
benefit to the change.
I agree with Owen on all points and oppose the policy change. Most
importantly, this policy change significantly raises the bar
for a legitimate IXP to get started while doing nothing effective to prevent
what is, effectively, a tiny amount of potential
abuse.
--
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Skype: brandonross
Schedule a meeting: http://www.doodle.com/bross
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
