Kevin is setting up a conference call based on your availability, so yes. Thanks
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2014, at 9:54 PM, "Martin Hannigan" <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Let me know if we can work on this before the meeting. > > Side note, I noticed that in January 2013 there was a PDP > simplification by the board. Another discussion happened in February > 2013. There was an update by Bill Woodcock, the "PDP Simplification > Chair" and then nothing. Might be a good committee to breathe some > life back into. > > Thanks! > > -M< > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Sweeting, John > <john.sweet...@twcable.com> wrote: >> Since I just received confirmation from the Primary I can now let you know >> it will be Kevin as primary and Bill D as secondary. They will be reaching >> out to you ASAP. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do at >> this time. Thanks again >> >> -john >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:52 PM, "Martin Hannigan" <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Who are the shepherds and should I expect to hear from them with plenty of >> time available prior to the next AC meeting to make potential initial >> adjustments? >> >> Best, >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 17, 2014, Scott Leibrand <scottleibr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Marc, >>> >>> Good input, thanks. Can you expand a bit on which aspects of the LRSA some >>> of your clients find burdensome, and which aspects of RIPE 605 they find >>> preferable? As we (and particularly the AC shepherds) work with the proposal >>> originator on getting a clear problem statement and then figuring out which >>> parts of prop-203 are in scope for the PDP (and which parts should be >>> submitted through the ACSP), it would be good to have your perspective on >>> what aspects of the RIPE policy would be most helpful for making sure that >>> transfers from non-RSA address holders get properly recorded. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Scott >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2014, at 11:53 AM, "Lindsey, Marc" <mlind...@lb3law.com> wrote: >>> >>> I advise several large legacy block holders. Some of them signed the >>> LRSA, but many have not. For them, the burdens imposed by the LRSA outweigh >>> the benefits. Some on the PPML have suggested that off-contract legacy >>> holders don't sign up with ARIN because they want to be free-riders. But >>> the fees (and the avoidance of the fees) are not a factor in their LRSA >>> decision. >>> >>> >>> >>> Based on my experience working with legacy block holders, I believe >>> adopting a policy substantially similar to RIPE 605 (ARIN prop 203) would go >>> a long way in harmonizing the interests of the ARIN community with the >>> community of legacy holders that do not have formal relationships with ARIN. >>> >>> >>> >>> ARIN's absolute control over additional allocations of "free" IPv4 numbers >>> in its region has served as the primary policy enforcement mechanism. This >>> carrot really only works on recipients that need more IPv4 numbers, and then >>> only as long as ARIN has free numbers to give out. It doesn't directly >>> influence the behavior of many legacy block holders when they convey their >>> spare numbers. Legacy holders are a major source of future IPv4 number >>> distributions, and their relevance to the broader ARIN community will become >>> more prominent as ARIN's IPv4 free pool reaches depletion. >>> >>> >>> >>> In the secondary market context, ARIN now relies on its ability to >>> withhold registry database updates as the primary means to extend >>> enforcement of its current policies into private transactions between >>> parties conveying beneficial use of IPv4 numbers. This, however, is a weak >>> enforcement tool. Two parties can convey beneficial use of IPv4 numbers in >>> lawful commercial transactions without updating ARIN's registry database. >>> But IPv4 number conveyances not recorded in the registry system produces >>> very undesirable results - the "reality" in the registry database will not >>> reflect operational reality, as David Conrad and others have pointed out in >>> several posts. >>> >>> >>> >>> Buyers and sellers would prefer to document their conveyances in a >>> reliable and accurate public registry, but not if the contingencies and >>> conditions materially and adversely affect their commercial arrangement. >>> RIPE 605/ ARIN prop 203 recognizes this reality. With a little tweaking, >>> adopting it would go a long way in minimizing the disincentives now facing >>> legacy holders (and entities that want to acquire their numbers) when >>> contemplating whether updating the registry database is worth the risk of >>> subjecting their transactions to ARIN's approval process. >>> >>> >>> >>> Marc Lindsey >>> Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby, LLP >>> 2001 L Street, NW Suite 900 >>> Washington, DC 20036 >>> Office: (202) 857-2564 >>> Mobile: (202) 491-3230 >>> Email: mlind...@lb3law.com >>> Website: www.lb3law.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PPML >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >>> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >> >> >> ________________________________ >> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable >> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to >> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for >> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not >> the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any >> dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the >> contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be >> unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the >> sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this >> E-mail and any printout. This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.