The ARIN AC would appreciate input from the community on this policy. Specifically, do you support raising the number of participants required to obtain an IXP micro allocation from 2 to 3?
Thanks, Andrew On 3/4/2014 12:13 PM, ARIN wrote: > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2014-7 > Section 4.4 Micro Allocation Conservation Update > > Date: 4 March 2014 > > Problem Statement: > > Two networks interconnecting are generally considered to be private > peers. The current policy allows an IXP to receive a micro-allocation > with only two devices. Given IPv4 exhaustion and the growth of IXPs in > North America it is prudent to raise the minimum criteria so that > micro-allocation space is not wasted. > > Policy statement: > > Change the following paragraph in Section 4.4 from: > > Exchange point operators must provide justification for the > allocation, including: connection policy, location, other participants > (minimum of two total), ASN, and contact information. > > To: > > Exchange point operators must provide justification for the > allocation, including: connection policy, location, other participants > (minimum of three total), ASN, and contact information. > > Comments: > a.Timetable for implementation: Immediate > b.Anything else: > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
