On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, David Farmer wrote:
On 3/10/14, 23:13 , Brandon Ross wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Andrew Dul wrote:
Specifically, do you support raising the number of participants required
to obtain an IXP micro allocation from 2 to 3?
An off-list conversation helped me clarify my concern about raising the
requirement. It's not just the burden of renumbering alone that's the
problem, it's the chilling effect it has on the market. It's already
hard enough to get a new IX started. Adding on to that with the
knowledge that you are unable to get permanent IP space when you start
only adds to the problem.
What if we changed the standard from "other participants (minimum of two
total)",to "other participants (minimum written commitment from three
separate participants to connect within 6 months)."
That change would change my negative support to neutral.
--
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Skype: brandonross
Schedule a meeting: http://www.doodle.com/bross
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
