On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
> There has not been a lot of feedback on this proposal. It would be nice to > have more input from a broader cross-section of the community. > > At present, I am leaning towards recommending that we abandon this > proposal for lack of support by the community. If you support this action, > please speak up. If you support this proposal, then it is vital that you > speak up. > I support the action of abandoning this proposal. I oppose the proposed policy. There are is a lack of demonstrated significant benefits and utility shown of changing the current limit, let alone having no limit on the minimum size of a transfer. There are plenty of potential future drawbacks of removing the longstanding limits; Including the usefulness to spammers, who would love to have a /32 from every /24 on the internet, if they could. And potential cross-organizational impacts from Real-time blacklists that blacklist /24s. Plus additional potential time and cost required from ARIN staff, members, and ISP resource holders, in particular, in dealing with users wishing to transfer a vanity /28, /29 or /32. > Thank you, > > Owen > -- -JH
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
