John Curran wrote: "If mandatory terms limits are desired for the ARIN Board of Trustees or ARIN AC, it would be best to write up the specific suggestion and submit the ARIN consultation and suggestion process, as noted by John Springer. I will bring the proposal and results of the discussion of the proposal on the arin-consult mailing list to the ARIN Board of Trustees for their further consideration."
I apologize if I sound combative, but I strongly dislike this suggestion. John, when there is time, can staff please tell us: - how many non-staff|non-board|non-AC|non-ASO/NRO|non-RIR subscribers are currently on arin-consult? - how many individuals (same exclusions as above) have posted to the list in the past 12 months? I strongly suspect the true participation numbers for this pseudo-invisible mailing list will be too low for any Bylaws change discussed exclusively there to meaningfully represent "bottoms-up participation". /david _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
