On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:19 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Azinger, Marla <marla.azin...@ftr.com> >> wrote: >> I think 6 years is too long. I would prefer to see one term contiguous >> limits with a 1-year-out waiting period.
Just in case anyone missed the nuance, I see value in asking the engaged and hardworking volunteers on the AC to sit out once in a while, just long enough to regain perspective from the outside. I don't see why that need be for longer than until the next election. I also note that we haven't had so many qualified volunteers for the position that we can afford to have folks sit out for three years. >> I would NOT support this for the board. ARIN benefits from the board's >> continuity. > > If you really want change, term limit the Board and forget the AC. Change for change's sake is rarely for the better. Stability is usually a good thing. I don't see rotating out AC members having a negative impact on ARIN's overall stability. Frequent turnover on the board, however... Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
