On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Bill Owens <ow...@nysernet.org> wrote:

> Please forgive my ignorance of the details of the policy development process, 
> but based on what I can see from looking at the timelines for other proposals 
> on the ARIN website, it doesn't appear to me that this policy has any time 
> left to be relevant. It appears that the proposal would need to be given a 
> fast track in order to even be approved before the likely runout of the 
> available IPv4 pool, much less implemented.

Bill - 

  As the present time, approvals of transfers also require assessment 
  against the same criteria that is used for issuance (only extended
  to 24 months of need), so the assignment/allocation policies may 
  still have relevance even after regional IPv4 free pool runout.
 
  I do not know how often this proposed policy would come into play 
  in future transfer requests, but it is quite possible it would be
  germane in some cases.

FYI,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN



_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to