On 9/19/2014 7:51 AM, Dale W. Carder wrote: > Thus spake Andrew Dul ([email protected]) on Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at > 07:29:03PM -0700: >> Thanks for your input, would you otherwise support the policy if we >> retained the existing /10 reservation for 4.10.2? > I have a hard time supporting any efforts to rearrange the v4 deck chairs. > Yes, some organizations won't be able to get v4 space, or at least not > easily. That is because there isn't any. We need to move on. If one > is starting from scratch now, they are going to get burned by definition. > > One thing I would like to hear more about is boot-strap issue with transfers? > > I guess I don't fully understand that problem space. > Dale, I invite you to review the presentation from ARIN staff about this issue which encouraged the conversation about this issue at the Chicago meeting and ended up with a small group of us creating this draft policy to address the issue.
https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_33/PDF/monday/nobile_policy.pdf The basic issue is that under the current transfer policy you have to qualify for address space under existing v4 policies to be able to do a transfer. The existing v4 policies require an ISP to have address space from another entity to be able to receive an allocation from ARIN. Thus, after run-out there may not be a way for some organizations to get into transfer market. Other draft policies have been put forward to address this issue in different ways, those include ARIN-2014-13, ARIN-2014-14, & ARIN-2014-18, ARIN-2014-20 Hope this helps, Andrew _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
