On Jun 1, 2015, at 5:34 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:11 PM, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: >> Ultimately, these matters are resolved based on mutual cooperation >> and a shared fabric of trust; while the registry may be an important >> common element of that fabric, that is still not the same thing as a >> legal right against the parties who participate. > > Discuss. With. ARIN. Counsel. Because you're plain wrong.
Bill - This has already been done, with several different attorneys over the course of many years. Please feel free to provide any available references to support your interesting perspective, and I will undertake the task again with your information in hand. (Mind you, it would be trivial to create the rights you suggest via ARIN’s registry service agreement and those customers who participate in the "routing infrastructure on the public Internet” – in theory, that would be no different that the rights you assert registrants already have, but the difference between theory and practice is likely to be quite large, i.e. there would likely be a number of service providers unwilling to accept such a legal obligation, despite their faithful adherence to the registry contents for determining bona fides for routing.) Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.