On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:39 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Seth Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Trying to make out a claim >> that one owns pure information without talking about other ways one >> could ground a try-able charge (and save court costs in attempting a >> case that's easily identified as tendentious) is just weird. > > Hi Seth, > > Meaning no disrespect, but Marc is a lawyer who whether right or wrong > has surely invested a sufficient portion of his life learning the > intricacies of law to speak with some authority on the subject. You > would do us all a courtesy by spending at least some effort learning > about intangible property before challenging his statements as > "weird."
You'd do us a courtesy by recognizing the difference between intangible property (of which there's all kinds) and ostensible rights in pure information. Seth > Also: > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > Thanks, > Bill Herrin > > > > -- > William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
