On Jun 5, 2015, at 1:36 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > So you can tell us the draft exceeds policy and impinges on ARIN > business procedure? You've suckered folks into that game one too many > times. Tell me the words you'd accept as requiring transfer > reciprocity and compatibility go beyond lip service and I'll advance > those words.
Bill - As always, I’m happy to aid you in policy development if you need assistance. With respect to NIR policy compatibility, is your your expectation that it has to allow outward transfers unconditionally, or simply allow the potential for outward transfers subject to any other conditions, e.g. payment of processing fee, signing of an agreement, etc? Do your require and/or allow enforcement of the condition that the source address holder must not have received a block within a certain time frame (if contained within NIR policy) Does the time period have to match those in the ARIN policy presently and/or stay in alignment with ARIN’s at all times? Post-transfer, dd you require the NIR to make any source entity ineligible to receive future sources via allocation and/transfer for some period? Does the period have to match ARIN’s present and/or ARIN’s future ineligibility period? > Else suffer the continued wagging of my finger. If you answer the questions above, I can craft text that should require NIR transfer reciprocity and compatibility to the level that you desire. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.