I don't think we want to have a policy where we give out an ipv6 /48 per
ipv4 /24. I'm all for giving people the space they need, but v6 is a
different mindset than v4. A /48 per site has generally been the goal
of most ipv6 policies.
Andrew
On 8/11/2015 3:05 PM, Alfie Cleveland wrote:
John -
Apologies if I wasn’t entirely clear. As referenced in Section 9.3.1.
of the APNIC INPP, I propose that this also applies to end users -
allowing end users to, free of charge, receive a /48 for each /24 they
hold.
Regards,
Alfie
On 11 Aug 2015, at 23:01, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net
<mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote:
On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Alfie Cleveland <al...@me.com
<mailto:al...@me.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I’m requesting comment in regards to automatically make
organisations eligible for IPv6 if they hold justified IPv4 space.
This similar to Section 9.3.1. of the [APNIC-127] APNIC Internet
Number Resource Policies. I feel that if organisations were able to
receive a /48 for each /24 they hold, then it would help expedite
the rollout of IPv6. Organisations currently have two choices -
continue to use IPv4, or spend valuable time on applying for IPv6
space. IPv6 space is clearly in abundance - and this could
potentially help slow the exhaustion of IPv4.
Alfie -
Per NRPM 6.5.2.2, an ISP qualifies for an IPv6 allocation if they
have a previously justified IPv4 ISP
allocation from ARIN (or one of its predecessor registries), or can
qualify for an IPv4 ISP allocation
under current criteria; i.e. this means that they presently are
automatically eligible for IPv6 if they
hold IPv4 space, as you suggest above.
Perhaps you are proposing that there be a default automatic size of
IPv6 allocation ("a /48 for each
/24 they hold”) which would allow for more expeditious preparation of
IPv6 initial requests, for those
who choose to receive this default allocation size rather than
calculating the "smallest nibble-boundary
aligned block that can provide an equally sized nibble-boundary
aligned block to each of the requesters
serving sites large enough to satisfy the needs of the requesters
largest single serving site using no
more than 75% of the available addresses”?
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
