> On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:48 , Steven Ryerse <srye...@eclipse-networks.com> > wrote: > > Owens comment from below: > “2. To the extent that there is supply, anyone who needs addresses can get > them already. Needs-based evaluation does not prevent those with need from > getting addresses… It prevents those without need from getting them.” > > Owen’s comment is absolutely false!!!!! It allows large organizing who > request resources to get what they need or something smaller. It allows > medium size organizations who request resources to get what they need or > something smaller. It allows small organizations who request resources to > get what they need or nothing, and there is no other source to get resources > if ARIN rejects a request, but the open market which Owen and others seem to > wish did not exist!
This is patently false. Many small organizations have gotten resources from ARIN. I have no problem with the open market so long as it conforms to the same needs-basis evaluations that were used for free pool assignments/allocations. Sure, organizations with larger needs have the option of getting less resources than they need, but I don’t see how that differs from what I said. Organizations with small needs can get what they need, assuming there is supply. I did not distinguish between supply from the market and supply from the free pool as I believe the rules should apply the same regardless of the source of resources. You say my statement is false and then go on to confirm that it is actually true. > It is time to fix this inequity and removing needs tests would be a big help > to small organizations who really need resources! What inequity? You haven’t yet shown one. Owen
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
