On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Elvis Daniel Velea <el...@velea.eu> wrote: > One more thing regarding the moving bits businesses.. > > the fact that service providers are willing to route blocks which are not > reflected in the registry indicates (at some level) support for more > transfer-friendly policies, even if they are not advocating for changes on > this list... > > my 2 cents, > elvis
In my opinion routing blocks that are not properly registered in IRRs isn't advocating for anything, it might be a sign of clueless/careless SP or a bad guy in sheep's clothes. At most, if they really must be advocating something, it's probably RPKI and similar stuff. On the same logic I might say that because some people steal they are indirectly in support for more theft-friendly laws, even if they don't state their wishes directly to the law makers. +0.02 EUR ;) Radu _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
