Thank you. __Jason
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Richard Jimmerson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Jason, > > From: Jason Schiller <[email protected]> > > Of the requests are unable to justify the block size they are > requesting with the heaviest consideration weight being > applied to their prior utilization trend, what percentage > are approved for a block larger than what their prior > utilization would have justified if that was the only > consideration? > > > To make sure I fully understand the question you asked, I will slightly > restate the request case type I believe you are isolating before providing > the answer: > > ISP or end-user requests an IPv4 block as a recipient of an 8.3 or 8.4 > transfer. ARIN staff conducts a needs assessment to determine the 24-month > need for the organization in accordance with NRPM. The block size they are > requesting is for a 24-month amount that exceeds their previous 24-month > utilization trend information. Therefore, ARIN staff applies heavier > consideration weight to the future plans and projections of the > organization by reviewing all related documentation they provide to > determine if the requested block size can be approved. > > For this isolated population of request case type: > > ~85% receive an approval for the originally requested block size. > > ~15% receive an approval for a block size smaller than what was requested. > > Warm regards, > > Richard Jimmerson > CIO & Interim Director of Registration Services > American Registry for Internet Numbers > > > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
