What I dislike about the proposed addition of: "- at least 50% utilization of each allocation and assignment"
... is it gives ARIN staff no room to take into account individual topology.
I may run a network at 95% utilization across all IP addresses. But I may also have a pool of addresses in datacenter X that is under 50% utilized. Why am I being penalized for something unrelated to the intent of the anti-abuse text?
I think I like the 2016-3 anti-abuse mechanism as-is. It is effective at stopping an abuse vector, and easy to implement across myriad topologies.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
