On 2 Jun 2017, at 4:14 AM, Chris James <ch...@datacate.com> wrote: > > Difficult to disagree w/Martin's logic. If we use SWIP to determine > eligibility for additional resources in the current environment; SWIP is > pointless thus the policy is a waste of time to all involved and this whole > back and forth is tiresome. > > If we wish to use SWIP as a means to manage abuse issues, then more stringent > guidelines are needed. I am not saying we need to penalize, but at least > standards. I agree with the /56 idea. > > John Curran (ARIN) Please advise ARIN's point of view. If you had to choose 1 > and only 1; is SWIP for Abuse or Allocation?
Chris - I had to chuckle a bit at your question…. ARIN is _your_ Regional Internet Registry. This means that you (the collective community) specify what we are to do, and then we do it – not the other way around. While I have personally been involved with several nationwide ISPs and have run a secure hosting company, my particular views must be subsumed into the ARIN community’s determination on such matters. (The status quo will be maintained until the community (or Board) provides direction on updated policy direction.) Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
