Okay so this formula.. does it just give us Afrinic and Lacnic right? So why don't we just say that? Since there are only 5 RIRs it seems that maybe a formula isn't needed?
{Ô,Ô} (( )) ◊ ◊ On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:35 PM, ARIN <i...@arin.net> wrote: > The following has been revised: > > * Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR > Transfers > > Revised text is below and can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_4.html > > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will > evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft > policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated > in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are: > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > The PDP can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html > > Regards, > > Sean Hopkins > Policy Analyst > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2017-4: Remove Reciprocity Requirement for Inter-RIR > Transfers > > Version Date: 6 September 2017 > > Problem Statement: > > AFRINIC and LACNIC are currently considering one-way inter-RIR transfer > proposals. Those RIR communities feel a one-way policy a policy that allows > network operators in their regions to obtain space from another region and > transfer it into AFRINIC and LACNIC may best meet the needs of the > operators in that region. > > ARIN staff, in reply to an inquiry from AFRINIC, have formally indicated > that ARINs 8.4 policy language will not allow ARIN to participate in such > one-way transfers. The staff formally indicate to AFRINIC that the word > reciprocal in 8.4 prohibits ARIN from allowing ARIN-registered space to > transfer directly to AFRINIC (in this context). > > ARIN as a community should recognize that other RIR operator communities > have different needs than we do. We should recognize that: > > - network operators in AFRINIC in LACNIC have need to obtain space in the > market; > > - have reasons they think are important to not allow two-way transfers; and > > - we should understand that the history of the RIR system has led to > LACNIC and AFRINIC having multiple orders of magnitude less IPv4 address > space than ARIN does. > > Policy statement: > > Add the following sentence after the first sentence of NRPM 8.4: > > Inter-RIR transfers may take place to an RIR with a non-reciprocal > inter-RIR transfer policy only when the recipient RIR has an IPv4 total > inventory less than the average (mean) of the IPv4 total inventory among > all of the RIRs. > > Timetable for implementation: Upon the ratification of any inter-RIR > transfer policy at another RIR that is one-way as described in the problem > statement. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.