The current text uses the terms "volunteer group, not-for-profit, non-profit, charitable organization, or educational institution"
My reading of this is that accreditation isn't a requirement. The text could be rewritten to remove educational institutions, but some of the community networks one might imagine are educational organizations (which are government entities, not necessarily registered/chartered as non-profit organization) Andrew On 9/20/2017 12:54 PM, Whitestone IT wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Kevin Blumberg <kev...@thewire.ca > <mailto:kev...@thewire.ca>> wrote: > > Andrew, > > 3) Why is the scope limited to post-secondary institution when > many smaller communities would not have that? Could accredited > educational institution be used instead? > > > Kevin &c, > > There are educational institutions that would perhaps qualify as a > volunteer or non-profit that would not qualify as an accredited > institution — accreditation is largely outside the reach of > organizations that I believe this policy is targeting. > > Is it necessary to limit to accredited educational institutions? Is it > possible to have a for-profit educational institution that would > otherwise qualify for a community network designation? > > Does the policy need to reference education at all? > > -- > Jeremy Austin > Whitestone, Alaska
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
