On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:54 PM David R Huberman <dav...@panix.com> wrote:
> > If I may, I'd like to try and re-focus the discussion of 2018-1 on the > network engineering problem that prompted this draft proposal. The > solution this draft policy proposal offers to the problem is where I think > the real value is, and where I think PPML needs to focus. > > Since the publication of RFC1997 in the 1996, network engineers have > utilized an extension of BGP called the BGP communities attribute to > enginer traffic (to "shape traffic") in a desirable way. > > RFC1997 only supports the use of 2-byte ASNs. As the free pool of 2-byte > ASNs began to shrink, a solultion was needed to enable networks > labelled with 4-byte ASNs to utilize BGP community attributes. > > In 2010, a draft of Flexible Community attribute was discussed, but no > working code was widely released. In 2016, a draft of Wide Comunity > attributes was released, but also resulted in no working code. Finally, > in February 2017, RFC8092 was published, and Large BGP Communities became > the protocol standard for defining 4-byte AS numbers within the BGP > community attribute. > > Working code exists for some equipment and software, is planned for other > equipment and software, but the point is that RFC8092-compliant code is > not prevelant in the DFZ. This is important because it means a network > operator who wants to shape their traffic properly with BGP communities > still needs a 2-byte ASN or it won't work. > > This proposal addresses the problem by allowing registrants of an unused > or unwanted 2-byte ASN to transfer the registration to a network operator > who needs one, all within the existing and community agreed-upon framework > of Inter-RIR transfers. > > For this reason, I support draft policy proposal ARIN-2008-1. > > I support this proposal for the same reason given: “This proposal addresses the problem by allowing registrants of an unused or unwanted 2-byte ASN to transfer the registration to a network operator who needs one, all within the existing and community agreed-upon framework of Inter-RIR transfers." — Brian > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.