I support the proposal as written. To Jason’s question: My opinion is it has limited usefulness today—I certainly don’t have a /19 sitting idle to assign to anyone. I prefer the proposal as written, however, I would not oppose making the check optional.
-Andy Hadenfeldt From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf Of Jason Schiller Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:23 PM To: Mike Burns <m...@iptrading.com> Cc: ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml@arin.net> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations The point of this provision was to ensure an ISP didn't re-allocate (or reassign) a large block of IPs to a down stream customer, and then find when they tried to get additional IP space that the large re-allocations (reassignment) was considered underutilized and prevents them for getting additional IP space. This then places the ISP in the difficult position of clawing back the resource, and likely aslo requires them to provide IP space for numbering into. I don't oppose the policy as written. But I would like to ask the ISPs if there is any benifit in keeping the provision as an optional check instead of its complete removal. Baased on the response I will happily support as written, or support making the check optional at the descresion of the resource holder. __Jason On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Mike Burns <m...@iptrading.com<mailto:m...@iptrading.com>> wrote: Hi John, I support this. I am all for streamlining the NRPM by removing artifacts from the free pool era. Regards, Mike From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net>] On Behalf Of John Springer Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:07 PM To: arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net> Subject: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2017-13: Remove ARIN Review Requirements for Large IPv4 Reassignments/Reallocations This draft policy seems straightforward and non-controversial. IMO, it is technically sound and promotes fair and impartial number policy. It has had support in the community. It is my intention to move to advance it to Recommended Draft Policy status at our next teleconference. Now would be a good time for further expressions of support. Statements of non-support are also solicited, if any. https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_13.html John Springer _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net<mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net>). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net<mailto:i...@arin.net> if you experience any issues. -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschil...@google.com<mailto:jschil...@google.com>|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
