> On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:13 PM, Jo Rhett <jrh...@netconsonance.com> wrote: > >> You’re entirely missing Michael’s point. DNSSEC is not a _treat_ that you >> dangle in front of universities, it’s an operational requirement for _the >> whole Internet_, of which your paying members are constituents. You’re >> denying _me_ the ability to use DNSSEC to validate addresses any time you >> prevent anyone from registering a DS record. > > What’s happening here is that you desire to not only continue to freeload > when ARIN has spent decades trying to get you to play nice with others, but > you want ARIN to create brand new services and then give those to you for > free. You cannot claim operational impact when you have refused for 25 years > to play by the rules.
I’m sorry, could you elaborate on each of those points?
How exactly am I freeloading, how am I not playing “nicely with others” or “by
the rules,” and how am I not operationally impacted if there’s someone out
there who’s not allowed to insert a DS record into a parent zone?
I eagerly await your answer.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
