In message <can-dau3yajwbgfyskyaz7jbmya7ruhr4jkf+mmm+_t0ng1z...@mail.gmail.com> David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
>Ok, I guess it is theoretically possible there are options that are >equivalent to retail theft detectors, with no impact on good actors. >However, I'm not aware of any policy options with such properties, all of >them that I can think of involve the balancing act I referred too. If you >have ideas for policies that only impact the bad actors please share them. Total transparency for everything. Your university would not have a problem with that. Nor would most publicly-traded companies. Nor would a majority of non-profits, I think. As I noted earlier, it's only the privately held commercial entities that fear transparency... many for good reasons, I'm sure. If anyone has any doubts about what I've just said, I can only suggest that you turn on your evening news tonight. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
