Speaking only as a member of the community and based only on my understanding of the PDP from reading it on the ARIN web site. If ARIN staff, the board, or the chair of the AC have a differing opinion, my words below should be considered in err.
Close… You are absolutely correct that the petition is not about the proposal’s merits (or lack thereof). In this case, the petition is actually to request that the ARIN Board review the AC decision. If the ARIN board reverses the AC decision that the proposal is out of scope, I believe it goes onto the AC Docket as a draft policy, though I’m not 100% sure whether it then remains under the editorial control of the authors (as would be the case for a petition against abandonment or delay) or whether it goes under the editorial control of the AC as is the case with a draft policy that didn’t become a draft through the petition process. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time this particular type of petition has been exercised. It is possible that the board will uphold the AC decision, in which case, I believe that’s the end of the process and the proposal remains off the docket. This is documented in section 3.2.1 of the PDP available at https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/#2-valid-petitions I hope this is helpful information. Owen > On Apr 26, 2019, at 23:44 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ARIN-PPML > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Michel, > > This proposal is being discussed already in RIPE and LACNIC and we are > working in the relevant changes for versions to be submitted in AFRINIC and > APNIC. > > As I understand the petition process is not for the proposal merits, but just > to be able to follow the process with it, so it can be discussed in the list. > > Regards, > Jordi > > El 27/4/19 4:02, "ARIN-PPML en nombre de Michel Py" > <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> > escribió: > >> Bill Herrin wrote : >> I oppose the proposed policy, but I think it reasonable for us to >> occasionally >> discuss and evaluate whether ARIN should be Internet-Cop in some novel new >> way. > > I oppose the proposed policy because I have very little faith in ARIN > being Internet-Cop in some novel new way that I have not seen yet. > Occasionally discuss sounds good, but what is novel here ? For this to > work, it would have to be a joint all-RIR effort. I don't see any traction > here, would someone comment on similar proposals in the other RIRs ? > > Michel > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
