On 6/25/2019 05:18 PM, ARIN wrote:
On 20 June 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-275:
[...]
When prop-254 (Clarification on IPv6 Sub-assignments), it was not related, neither intended, to modify the “exclusivity” criterion.
[...] Huh? This sounds totally garbled to me.
Note that the incidental or transient use of address space by third parties, within the network of the recipient organization, shall not be considered a reassignment or a violation of the exclusive use criterion
Maybe "use of address space by AUTHORIZED third parties" (meaning authorized by the recipient)?
-- John Santos Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539 _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
