I am in favor of this change. We should be encouraging people to use NRPM 4.10 where applicable instead of sitting on the general waiting list.
-Scott On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:44 AM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > The AC is currently considering this draft policy which would provide for > Multiple Discrete Networks to be able to get more than one block under 4.10 > for up to 8 discrete sites within a six month period. > > So far, there has been little comment on the list. The AC would like to > encourage feedback whether positive or negative in nature about this > proposal (though always constructive in any case). > > Thanks, > > Owen > > Proposal text: > > Problem Statement: > Currently, applicants for IPv4 resources under section 4.10 of the NRPM > who do so under a single OrgID of the NRPM may only obtain one /24 every > six months for the OrgID, even in the case where multiple discrete networks > (MDNs) as defined in section 4.5 of the NRPM are grouped under that OrgID. > On the other hand, where MDNs are held under different OrgIDs associated > the same entity, the six-month constraint would apply to each discrete > network separately. This results in unfair allocations of resources based > solely on how entities choose to associate MDNs with their OrgIDs. This > policy rectifies that problem by placing MDNs on an equal footing for the > purpose of section 4.10 allocations regardless of how they are grouped by > OrgID by the same ultimate entity. > Policy Statement: > Bullet 1. under section 4.10 of the NRPM is amended to read: > the applicant may not have received resources under this policy in the > preceding six months, except to the extent that the applicant is r > equesting resources for a discrete network in respect of which it has not > received any resources under this policy in the preceding six months; > Add a new bullet 6 that reads: > An applicant requesting multiple allocations under this policy to support > Multiple Discrete Networks, as defined under Section 4.5, may not receive > more than the equivalent of a /21 of IPv4 address space in any one > six-month period hereunder. > Timetable for Implementation: Immediate > Anything Else: > To what extent should the passage of this policy be contingent or > independent of whether any ultimate cap is imposed on the total quantity of > IPv4 resources that an entity can obtain under section 4.10 regardless of > the number of OrgIDs associated with the entity or number of MDNs it holds. > > ========== > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.