On 26 Dec 2019, at 10:25 PM, David Farmer <far...@umn.edu<mailto:far...@umn.edu>> wrote:
Responses are inline; On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:38 PM Fernando Frediani <fhfredi...@gmail.com<mailto:fhfredi...@gmail.com>> wrote: There are two points to analyze in this proposal: - Any returned, reclaimed or revoked addresses that belong originally to the reserved pools to be returned to them. I think this was pretty obvious and was already done this way and wouldn't be necessary to state it again. Could the author show that this is not the way it is currently done then I am fine to support this part. I'm not sure how ARIN staff does this now. However, if this is what we want, it is usually better for it to be clearly stated in the policy. Blocks designated as special use are put back in whichever pool they belong to, 4.4 or 4.10, respectively. It is certainly the case that if you wanted ARIN to do something different than that, the alternative would need to be clearly spelt out in policy – the highly obvious nature of returning blocks to their special pools doesn’t necessarily require any specification in policy, unless it is being done to avoid having such blocks inadvertently become subject to new policy language. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
