What does "closed with no action" mean? Does it mean the RSP abandoned the request?
On 4/15/2020 7:18 PM, John Sweeting wrote:
Hi Andrew, The numbers around this are: 320 3x small RSPs 30 have applied and been approved for IPv6 of which 26 closed with no action to complete by the requester. The other 4 are currently still open and pending action. Thanks, John S. On 4/15/20, 11:30 AM, "Andrew Dul" <andrew....@quark.net> wrote: John,Could you provide the community with a rough magnitude of this issue? Approximately how many of these 3x-small ISP organizations have come toARIN and requested IPv6? How many accepted the block and how many refused because of the fee issue? How many 3x-small ISP organizations does ARIN currently serve.Thanks,AndrewOn 4/14/2020 2:29 PM, John Sweeting wrote:> All, > > For anyone interested in the content of the "Policy Experience Report presented by Registration > Services to the AC at its annual workshop in January 2020" referenced in the problem statement you can see that report here: > > https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/ac/meetings/2020_0124/policy_experience_report.pdf > > Thank you. > > On 3/24/20, 1:22 PM, "ARIN-PPML on behalf of ARIN" <arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net on behalf of i...@arin.net> wrote: > > On 19 March 2020, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted > "ARIN-prop-285: IPv6 Nano-allocations" as a Draft Policy. > > Draft Policy ARIN-2020-3 is below and can be found at: > > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2020_3/ > > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will > evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft > policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as > stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these > principles are: > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > * Technically Sound > * Supported by the Community > > The PDP can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/ > > Regards, > > Sean Hopkins > Policy Analyst > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2020-3: IPv6 Nano-allocations > > Problem Statement: > > ARIN's fee structure provides a graduated system wherein organizations > pay based on the amount of number resources they consume. > > In the case of the very smallest ISPs, if a 3X-Small ISP (with a /24 or > smaller of IPv4) gets the present minimal-sized IPv6 allocation (a /36), > its annual fees will double from $250 to $500/year. > > According to a Policy Experience Report presented by Registration > Services to the AC at its annual workshop in January 2020, this > represents a disincentive to IPv6 adoption with a substantial fraction > of so-situated ISPs saying "no thanks" and abandoning their request for > IPv6 number resources when informed of the impact on their annual fees. > > This can be addressed by rewriting subsection 6.5.2(b). Initial > Allocation Size to allow allocation of a /40 to only the smallest ISPs > upon request, and adding a new clause 6.5.2(g) to cause an automatic > upgrade to at least a /36 in the case where the ISP is no longer 3X-Small. > > Reserving /40s only for organizations initially expanding into IPv6 from > an initial sliver of IPv4 space will help to narrowly address the > problem observed by Registration Services while avoiding unintended > consequences by accidentally giving a discount for undersized allocations. > > Policy Statement: > > Replace the current 6.5.2(b) with the following: > > b. In no case shall an LIR receive smaller than a /32 unless they > specifically request a /36 or /40. > > In order to be eligible for a /40, an ISP must meet the following > requirements: > * Hold IPv4 direct allocations totaling a /24 or less (to include zero) > * Hold IPv4 reassignments/reallocations totaling a /22 or less (to > include zero) > > In no case shall an ISP receive more than a /16 initial allocation. > > Add 6.5.2(g) as follows: > > g. An LIR that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is entitled to > expand the allocation to any nibble aligned size up to /32 at any time > without renumbering or additional justification. /40 allocations shall > be automatically upgraded to /36 if at any time said LIR's IPv4 direct > allocations exceed a /24. Expansions up to and including a /32 are not > considered subsequent allocations, however any expansions beyond /32 are > considered subsequent allocations and must conform to section 6.5.3. > Downgrades of any IPv6 allocation to less than a /36 are not permitted > regardless of the ISP's current or former IPv4 number resource holdings. > > Comments: > > The intent of this policy proposal is to make IPv6 adoption at the very > bottom end expense-neutral for the ISP and revenue-neutral for ARIN. The > author looks forward to a future era wherein IPv6 is the dominant > technology and IPv4 is well in decline and considered optional leading > the Community to conclude that sunsetting this policy is prudent in the > interests of avoiding an incentive to request undersized IPv6 allocations. > > Timetable for implementation: Immediate > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues._______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
-- John Santos Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539 _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
