I support the concept. While we realized we might not ever get our request for a block, we needed to take steps to be in the queue and were denied a /22 because we had an original /20 (and a /24 from being on a previous list).
From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net> On Behalf Of Andrew Dul Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 1:40 PM To: arin-ppml@arin.net Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16 I do not support the reintroduction of organizations onto the wait-list who were removed due to having existing address holdings larger than a /20. Being on the wait-list was never a guarantee that you would receive space. The AC had to balance the various elements of block size and organizations who would be eligible to receive space under the updated policy and we were aware that the rules as implemented would prevent some organizations on the wait-list from receiving blocks going forward.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
