On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:24 PM John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: > On 12 Oct 2020, at 3:55 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >> Another example: in the Microsoft/Nortel >> matter ARIN negotiated an alternate contract with Microsoft rather >> than allow the bankruptcy court to proceed to rule on whether ARIN >> could be compelled to transfer a legacy registration without one. > > The above is also incorrect - ARIN had no concern about a ruling, but such > was unnecessary since the parties agreed to condition the sale on compliance > with ARIN’s policies and Microsoft’s entry into an RSA with ARIN.
Oh really? Perhaps I've misunderstood. Is it ARIN's position that everybody receiving a transfer of what were originally legacy resources may do so under the Legacy RSA rather than be expected to use the standard RSA? If not, how exactly do you explain ARIN's gracious deviation on Microsoft's behalf? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
