Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML wrote:
On Sep 10, 2021, at 19:29 , William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Mike Burns <m...@iptrading.com> wrote:
May I ask if you're thinking changes with the understand that all of the
addresses being considered are going to be purchased.
Hi Mike,
I suppose my real worry is that the address sale market dries up
because it's more lucrative to lease them. With leasing agents running
around helping address holders monetize their IP addresses through
leasing in order to take a cut. That would be a travesty.
Would it? The easiest way to eliminate leasing providers outright is to migrate
to v6.
The industry seems to prefer leasing providers over v6, so meh. Are all the
market
proponents going to claim the invisible hand is wrong now?
Owen
The invisible hand has its middle finger extended, telling you and those
like you what many have been saying for years unto deaf ears. IPv6 and
its migration have been and continue to be an utter disaster, created
purely out of ivory tower hubris that designed it to be an incompatible
dual stack dual cost useless investment for most of the actual users of
the network.
And it was easily predictable.
Joe
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
