Larry R. Dockery wrote:
I am the proposal author and I will be withdrawing the proposal in light of the routing issue. I believe there is a valid concern in IPv6 PA re-addressing for SMBs as outlined in the proposal, but they are occasional and minor in comparison to the routing issues presented by expanding PI availability of smaller assignments. Thank you.
The dependency on a viable routing system to route the intended to be routed number resources assigned by ARIN would suggest a keen interest in its stability is an appropriate concern for the organization.
However, to what extent is routing utility part of ARIN's mission and policy focus?
I would suggest that it may be possible and perhaps even feasible and maybe maybe even desirable, especially with RPKI to designate assigned prefixes as not intended for the global DFZ. In which case, they could be used with translation instead of ULA, they could be used in layered edge driven multihoming or they could perhaps eventually mature and be converted to gDFZ applicable status.
Such an initiative, were it to be successful, might spur wider adoption of edge driven multihoming/routing which would actually be beneficial to the gDFZ.
Joe _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
