Agreed. This is utterly embarrassing. How did they think this is an appropriate response given the conversation going on this list? Perhaps lawyers? What needs to be done to fix this so if those being rejected request transparency that transparency is provided?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:18 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:44 AM Scott Leibrand <scottleibr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > this non-explanation makes a mockery of the entire concept of an > explanation. > > +1 > > When in the course of human events, a decent respect to the opinions > of mankind requires we say the dude just wasn't good enough. Really? > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin > b...@herrin.us > https://bill.herrin.us/ > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
