On Tue, Apr 12, 2022, at 4:33 PM, John Curran wrote:
> It’s much more basic than that - legacy resource holders received their
> blocks from parties who were issuing them pursuant to agreements with the US
> Government to do so, and under circumstances where the corresponding
> responsibilities were not clearly spelt out. While responsibility for
> administration of the number resources has passed to ARIN, that doesn’t mean
> that any given legacy resource holder is aware of such a change, is aware
> that this community would expect good contact information to be maintained,
> or is aware of any other obligations that may get put into registry policy.
I'm sorry but this is utter nonsense. You weren't assigned this responsibility
last week, last month, even last decade. The idea that a legacy resource holder
could be ignorant of your assignment of responsibility almost 25 years after it
happened is poppycock.
In absolutely no legal context is any entity, be it a person, a business, or
even a conceptual entity allowed to disregard regulations because they occurred
after they received a resource. Am I allowed to ignore traffic laws created
after I purchased my car? Absolutely not. Is the DMV allowed to change its
regulations after I purchased my car? Certainly. Would the state of California
be allowed to replace the DMV with an entirely different entity with entirely
different regulations at their own whim? Absolutely.
It's been 2 and a half decades, it's time to stop pandering this nonsense. I
was totally in favor of making exceptions for legacy resources back when this
started. Two decades later, when a majority of the people who received
resources under said agreements (raises hand) are retired or dead, and we're
still making exceptions for them?
Please stop reinforcing this patent fantasy that "you can use this" on the back
of the envelope was a commercial contract guaranteeing anything. When I got my
first allocation from Jon it was on the back of the paper our request was
provided on. There was no guarantee of anything, it was entirely plausible that
the rules would change next week. The first time I got an allocation that had
anything like an assurance on it, the assurance was that it was only valid for
24 months. There was never, ever, any plausible expectation that this was a
lifetime guarantee assignment, forever and ever, amen. Back in those days
funding for the entire project was always in doubt, there was a real likelyhood
it could be shut down any week or month. These were never commercial contracts
(it was technically illegal to use for commercial purposes back in the "back of
the envelope" days), and anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is full of crap.
Nobody I worked with in the days before the 24 months clause is still alive.
The people I trained when I left my role and moved to the west coast have
retired after long careers. How about we retire this nonsense at some point
before nobody who has ever known a legacy resource holder remains alive?
--
Jo Rhett
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
