On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 9:47 PM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > While it’s true that ARIN does not make the authenticated IRR or RPKI > available to legacy holders without a contract, those that care > to publish the information are free to do any of the following: > + Transfer their legacy resources to RIPE and publish RPKI there > + Use ALT-DB or another IRR to publish their RPSL statements >
Transferring your resources to RIPE will either require a contract with RIPE if you wish to become an LIR or a contract with a sponsoring LIR. So, you are probably not doing RPKI without some kind of contract. You may have some choices on who you contract with, but I see a contract in your future if you want to do RPKI. As for ALT-DB that could be an option. However, if content providers start requiring authenticated IRR information, which is being at least talked about, then ALT-DB might only be a short-term option. > I will admit that during the original debate, I opposed the creation of > this field expecting that it would end up exactly where it is now. Of > limited > use and even less accuracy. > > IMHO, it’s well past time to recognize this as a failed experiment and > clean up after it. > The experiment was not a failure, but we have better options now, so I agree it's time for it to go. > Owen > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.