On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 9:47 PM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote:

>
> While it’s true that ARIN does not make the authenticated IRR or RPKI
> available to legacy holders without a contract, those that care
> to publish the information are free to do any of the following:
> + Transfer their legacy resources to RIPE and publish RPKI there
> + Use ALT-DB or another IRR to publish their RPSL statements
>

Transferring your resources to RIPE will either require a contract with
RIPE if you wish to become an LIR or a contract with a sponsoring LIR. So,
you are probably not doing RPKI without some kind of contract. You may have
some choices on who you contract with, but I see a contract in your
future if you want to do RPKI.

As for ALT-DB that could be an option. However, if content providers start
requiring authenticated IRR information, which is being at least talked
about, then ALT-DB might only be a short-term option.


> I will admit that during the original debate, I opposed the creation of
> this field expecting that it would end up exactly where it is now. Of
> limited
> use and even less accuracy.
>
> IMHO, it’s well past time to recognize this as a failed experiment and
> clean up after it.
>

The experiment was not a failure, but we have better options now, so I
agree it's time for it to go.


> Owen
>


-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:far...@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to