Hi Bill,

 

I feel your pain and I think it’s sad that there is not more participation from 
these candidates.

And I agree with Fernando that affiliations or connections to IP brokers would 
be a point in their favor considering they are the people distributing IPv4 
addresses these days.

Makes sense to have their guidance. 

 

Regards,
Mike

 

 

 

 

From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net> On Behalf Of Fernando Frediani
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 8:28 AM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] AC candidates

 

Hi Bill

Also check other details that may be concerning for example if any of them have 
affiliations or connections to any IP brokers or what kind of proposals that 
may put in jeopardy ARIN registered resources.
Fernando

On 26/10/2023 04:42, William Herrin wrote:

Howdy,
 
As I think about how to vote for the AC candidates, I figured I'd
check the list archives to see how each one went about arguing for and
against proposals over the years. Seems like a reasonable way to
evaluate a candidate judged "well qualified," right?
 
Imagine my surprise. Of the 14 candidates, only 5  have posted here as
a member of the general public. Ever. Even a couple of the current AC
members have only posted here in their official capacity on the AC.
 
I don't know what to say.I just don't know what to say.
 
Regards,
Bill Herrin
 
 

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to