> On Oct 27, 2023, at 14:05, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: > > >> On Oct 27, 2023, at 2:32 PM, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml@arin.net> >> wrote: >> >> That sounds good in principle, Michael, but the reality is that none of the >> fora you suggested provide for an interactive discussion amongst the broader >> community. >> >> While it’s true that the general-members list reached the electorate, the >> impact of the AC is felt not only by the electorate, but also by the broader >> community. > > The impact of ARIN’s elections, registration services agreement, Board of > Trustee elections, etc. are also > all topics that could affect the broader community – so that property (in and > of itself) is not a particularly > compelling argument for mandate of the use of ppml.
Agreed… But... > > There are tradeoffs in having such discussions here on ppml (e.g., not > everyone here may necessarily > want to be buried in discussion of ARIN election processes) versus the > general-member mailing list > (where discussion of such minutiae might cause drop in general members > interest or participation), > so this needs to be carefully considered by the community. Sure, but there’s no other list open to those interested who are not general members. > We will hold an appropriate consultation in the future to discuss this issue > and so that the merits of various > approaches can be considered. In the interim, suggestions for the > improvements to the ARIN election > process should be directed to the ARIN ACSP > <https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/> I consider this a reasonable alternative at this juncture. Owen
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
