On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 21:41 Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > > On May 22, 2024, at 21:24, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 5:07 PM Tyler O'Meara via ARIN-PPML < > arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote: > >> Overall I support this change, but I have a few nitpicks: >> >> 1) We should only include abbreviations/other names for the term if >> they're >> actually used in the NRPM; I think future text that uses this definition >> would >> be clearer if we selected a single acronym. >> > > But that's not the way the real world works. All the acronyms are in use > unfortunately. > > >> 2) I would remove the reference to Ethernet (or provide it as an >> example); we >> shouldn't prescribe what L2 switching technology gets used by the IXP >> > > Open IX OIX-1, an ANSI standard, prescribes ethernet for IX's and > https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/1555 > There's pretty much a slammed door on the idea that a router is an IX as > well. > > > IMHO, Open IX OIX-1 is in error here. I think that prescribing a specific > transport technology is flawed. >
Perhaps. But it was a heavy lift by the OIX Community with wide consensus and in terms of “standards composition” not entirely unique being prescriptive eg TIA568A/B - but I get it. FYI only, -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.