On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:22 Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Again, I think (and if I were involved in Open-IX would argue there) that > their standard is over-specified and over-constrained. While 802.3z and > 802.3ae are very common interfaces today, I know, for example, that there > are at least a couple of IXPs that are considering (if not implemented) the > elimination of 802.3z and moved up to 802.3ae as a minimum IX connection. I > think the days of every IX offering 1Gpbs connections are certainly > numbered as 10G becomes ever cheaper to implement. >
I hear you. We disagree (rarely). The benefit is we close a massive hole in policy and not replace one loop hole with another. There are other prescriptive requirements in the NRPM. Multihoming. 6.4.4. Minimum allocation sizes. Policies by shepherd singling out IX allocation sizes eg /26. IETF -> IANA global instructions. Nothing really new here. HTH -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
