Thank you for the suggestion!

One intended goal of the policy was aggregation, but compliance was not 
defined.  I would appreciate any suggestions that you have on compliance and 
enforcing the aggregation per celestial body.
________________________________
From: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> on behalf of David Farmer via 
ARIN-PPML <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 11:48 AM
To: Martin Hannigan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] TIPTOP


On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 5:12 PM Martin Hannigan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 13:07 Tony Li 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Fernando,

> Honestly, what is the demand of it in terms of devices, networks right now 
> and for the next few years ?

In 2025, there were about a dozen space missions of note. I would expect the 
same with a slow linear increase for the foreseeable future.

+1 to find a policy solution to support this need.

Demand doesn't matter. A need presented by a community does. They(network and 
other engineers building these networks) already have demand using the 
resources.

There's no good reason to argue if aggregation benefits are important both 
policy or technical. ICP2 and the NRPM say so. The high level resource 
engineering discussed  is a “duh” moment. Physics.

I also support a policy to allocate resources for use in deep space and to 
aggregate them around celestial bodies. However, the current policy doesn't 
seem to include any kind of commitment from the entities receiving the 
resources to use them in accordance with the proposed aggregation. Without even 
a theoretical commitment by the resource holders to implement the intended 
aggregation, how will it ever be achieved? Obviously, there will be limits to 
what ARIN can contractually enforce; nevertheless, it seems prudent that 
resources received under this policy have some minimal exceptions to implement 
the intended aggregation. Without at least a minimal commitment to fulfill the 
intended aggregation, creating a new policy regime seems unwise.

--
Thank you / Ho Pidamayado / Miigwech
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:[email protected]<mailto:email%[email protected]>
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2829 University Ave SE    Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to