... is going to quickly turn into a clusterf*** if people don't step in sharp-ish and help out.
> [Wikipedia correctness and authoritative edits] > >> interesting situation - one that wikipedia's clearly never had to deal >> with before. > > Rather than spend a paragraph or two talking about that, I suggest that we > just build more robust external sources that the Wikipedia page can make use > of. Personally, I'm not a Wikipedia person, but I can possibly spend a little > more time looking at the page. (My previous edits were mostly about fixing up > citations, of which more are needed as the page stands.) yeahyeah, i noticed - appreciated. okay. well, i've had to revert *six* false and misleading statements on the page... so far. unfortunately the wikifascists [1] are beginning to step in - one of them unfortunately has Administrative rights. a "COI" notice was set up: this resulted in a rash of further misleading and factually incorrect statements being made. if people care about this, can you please step in? l. [1] definition (2) of http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fascist _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
