I have indeed shown my point of view without explaining the exact reasons (I said it caused trouble and I agree that it is a very vague anwser) I redirect you to these links that resumes with better words my point of view.
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6918 and http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2122 Good reading Le 16/09/2016 22:22, mdn a écrit : > I am just a lurker a seeker of knowledge on this email list and tend to > stay out of discussions knowing that I don't have has much knowledge has > the people discussing here. > > But I can't stay an say nothing on this subject I speak for Myself and > only Myself and my response is > no, I don't want that > > Your heart may be in the right place but we all know where this leads. > COC like the Contributor Covenant have made enough trouble and it has to > stop. > > Le 16/09/2016 22:06, Sam Pablo Kuper a écrit : >> I am still new to this community, and am more of a lurker than a >> contributor. >> >> Many of the projects I am interested in have a code of conduct of some >> kind, typically based on the Contributor Covenant[0]. If they are >> well-written and proportionate, I find them welcoming. And I, >> correspondingly, welcome them. Not because anything especially terrible >> has happened to me in such communities, but because it would send a >> clear message that nothing terrible should happen to me or to anyone >> else as a result of participating, and that were such to happen, it >> would not be tolerated lightly. >> >> I searched this mailing list's archive, the Rhombus Tech wiki, and the >> elinux.org wiki, for evidence of a code of conduct. >> >> Happily, the elinux.org wiki does effectively have a code of conduct: >> >> http://elinux.org/ELinuxWiki:Policies_%26_Guidelines >> >> However, neither the arm-netbook mailing list nor the Rhombus Tech wiki >> has one, as far as I can see. >> >> Does anyone else here think it would be, on balance, a good idea to >> adopt a Code of Conduct, perhaps based on the Contributor Covenant[0], >> for some combination of: this mailing list; the Rhombus Tech wiki? >> >> I would welcome concise responses in this thread, ideally formatted >> along the lines: >> >> """ >> - arm-netbook list: yes. >> >> - Rhombus Tech wiki: yes. >> """ >> >> I would, personally, *not* welcome receiving supporting arguments for >> your position, for the following reasons: >> >> - I am much more interested in the community's view on whether or not >> adopting such a code would be a good idea, than its view on why it would >> or would not be a good idea. >> >> - In discussions of the merits of such codes of conduct, both supporters >> and detractors typically raise pros or cons that have already been >> raised, by them or others, in at least one of the many such discussions >> that have occurred other communities. That is, the arguments on both >> sides of the debate are quite well-worn. I would prefer anyone >> interested in such pros and cons to look them up (e.g. search the Web) >> than to expend effort re-hashing them here. >> >> - Such discussions of rationale often become contentious. The last thing >> I want is to cause acrimony on the list. >> >> I hope that affirmative replies will predominate. If they do, then I >> will at some point in the future probably add a draft Code of Conduct >> page to the Rhombus Tech wiki and/or ask Luke to add one to the mailing >> list web page[1], as appropriate (unless someone else acts first). If >> they don't, or if nobody replies, then I'll quietly let this go. >> >> Thanks :) >> >> spk >> >> [0] http://contributor-covenant.org/ >> [1] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook >> >> _______________________________________________ >> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk >> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook >> Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk > -- Note: veuillez s'il vous plaît utiliser GnuPg pour nos future conversations https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/fr/ Plus d'info ici: http://www.bibmath.net/crypto/index.php?action=affiche&quoi=moderne/pgp Message envoyer avec GNU Icedove un fork de Thunderbird https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Icedove
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk