On 30/01/17 03:33, Julie Marchant wrote: > On 01/30/2017 05:25 AM, Alain Williams wrote: >> Unfortunately that is not good enough ... you are assuming that people will >> use >> the monchrome version of the logo rather than just photocopying the colour >> one >> on a monochrome copyier. > > You can easily prevent that with a trademark policy... and why would > someone choose to make their own half-baked monochrome conversion when a > proper one is available?
Yes, and no. For real publicity, they shouldn't, and the trademark policy should solve the remaining issues. The problem is that there are a /lot/ of BW printers and xeroxes out there still, and documents with the colour logo /will/ get printed on them and passed around. The colour logo should therefore be recognizable when printed in monochrome. Beautiful would be ideal, but as long as it isn't horrible to look at and makes sense, that will work. Tor -- Tor Chantara http://www.fineartmarquetry.com/ GPG Key: 2BE1 426E 34EA D253 D583 9DE4 B866 0375 134B 48FB *Be wary of unsigned emails* Stop spying: http://www.resetthenet.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
