Some volunteers looking at the lastest version [i.e. through the page's source] and test reading what's drafted so far to make sure none of this is too cryptic or vague. Critically thought-out feedback is also highly-appreciated to test comprehension accuracy.
--- If anyone disagrees with the fundamental perception of reality, feedback pertaining to that is very much welcome however not a priority unless you have quantifiable evidence of a severe error, such as a demonstrate-ably notable text with an authoritative audience or intuition based on shared or communicable observation. [i.e. videography, scenes in notable fiction with either authoritative authorship or audience, bulletins or bulletinized documentation with either attribute, characteristics of any major language which suggest possible thoughts per the Sapir-Worf hypothesis*, etc] * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Languages_of_Pao#Plot_summary * Thoughts aren't made strictly possible by linguistic relativity, however uncommunicable thoughts are likely to get cannibalized and forgotten, by and because of [respectively] communicable ones. Don't get my meaning confused. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
