Chris Tyler <ch...@tylers.info> writes: > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 08:15 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Chris Tyler <ch...@tylers.info> writes: >> >> > Hi Nick, >> > >> > I haven't set up a testing configuration yet but this looks very much >> > like what we need. >> > >> > Before each linking pass, will the script attempt to flip all the >> > libraries to the 'current' API? (Thinking down the road, one >> > ramification is that all of the libraries installed into the mock chroot >> > will need to be writable by the mock user). >> >> Why can't the runtime linker make the change when it loads the >> libraries? Why would it require changing the files on disk? > > Sorry, to clarify: I meant for static linking (and the fat binary > approach is only to bootstrap an optimized armv7hl build).
Okay, stupid question but again, why can't the static linker make the changes to the in-core version of the library before it writes out the resulting binary? Actually, shouldn't the static linker write out a fat binary? > -Chris -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warl...@mit.edu PGP key available _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm